Legal Opinion

Hager v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1893No. 14982PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment .of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries to property (horses aud harness) resulting from a collision with a train of cars at a railroad crossing in the city of Oakland. A nonsuit was ordered by the trial court aud the plaintiff has appealed.

The accident occurred in the settled portion of the city. The train was going at the rate of thirty or thirty-five miles an *310hour, and the engineer was neither ringing the bell nor blowing the whistle, as required by the statute. The team injured consisted of six horses attached to a band wagon containing sixteen men. The train was a regular train…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Meeks v. S. Pac. R. R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Koch v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Everett v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API