Von Hoffmann v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHIN, District Judge.
In 1987, plaintiff Ladislaus Von Hoff-mann (“Von Hoffmann”) purchased $30 million worth of “vanishing premium” life insurance from defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”). Defendant Alexander & Alexander, Inc. (“A & A”) was the broker. Premiums were to “vanish” after seven years because the first seven years worth of premiums were expected to generate sufficient dividends to eliminate the need for Von Hoff-mann to pay any further premiums. Prudential and A & A were careful to provide disclaimers; they advised Von Hoffmann that the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- New York University v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Gaidon v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Dodds v. Cigna Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Eaves v. Designs for Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Camofi Master LDC v. College Partnership, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Cooper v. Berkshire Life InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Kermanshah v. KermanshahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.