Legal Opinion

Alexier v. Matzke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1908No. Docket No. 21Published

Error, to Alpena; Emerick, J. Assumpsit by August Alexier, Jr., against William Matzke for work and labor. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

The plaintiff is a deaf mute. He brought suit against defendant, who is his brother-in-law, for work and labor. Plaintiff lost his speech and hearing when about three years old as a result of sickness. He can write his name, and read a little in German. He has never been instructed by the usual methods used by deaf mutes to communicate with others. He communicates with some of his family by the use of motions and a *37limited number of signs, and watching the movements of the lips.

These parties are all German and speak the German language. In August, 1884, plaintiff, then 19 years of age, under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Woodin v. DurfeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Druse v. WheelerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Collins v. TrotterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Hunt v. Supreme CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Lange v. PerleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API