Legal Opinion

Woodin v. Durfee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1881PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Error to St. Clair. Appeal from tbe allowance of a claim by commissioners on the estate. The administrator brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

In the circuit court the judge directed the jury to return a verdict for the plaintiff; and the writ of ■error raises the question whether he could rightfully do this on the ease as it stood.

The respondent in the circuit court was the estate of Albert Staley. The claimant was Sarah M. Durfee, as administratrix on the estate of James F. Durfee, deceased. The claim was made upon a bond, which, with the justification of sureties and approval of the probate judge, is given in the margin.* No question is made that the jurisdictional *426facts essential to the giving of a valid bond existed, bnt it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. Township of KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. HerndonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Haughton v. Aetna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API