Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Wilson & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 25, 1943No. 1115PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

In this case I make the following findings of fact:

1. This suit is brought in the name of Tirzah P. Dunn as plaintiff. She is a resident of St. Louis, Missouri.

2. Wilson & Co., Inc., defendant, is a Delaware corporation.

3. Prior to February 23, 1935, the effective date of the amendment to defendant’s Certificate of Incorporation, which is now in question, defendant had outstanding three classes of stock, i. e., 7% Cumulative Preferred, Class A, and Common Stock.

4. The former 7% Preferred Stock was entitled to receive dividends, when and as declared by the board of…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perrott v. United States Banking CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  2. Barrett v. Denver Tramway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
  3. In Re Tate-Jones & Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Dunn v. Wilson & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  5. Patterson-Schwartz & Associates, Inc. v. Unit, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API