Dunn v. Wilson & Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
After the opinion was filed in the case at bar, a decree in plaintiff’s favor was directed to be submitted. See, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 655. Defendant objects to plaintiff’s proposed form of decree. While the major issues determined here with respect to defendant’s plan of reclassification have been both directly and indirectly involved in much litigation in Delaware, Keller v. Wilson & Co., 21 Del.Ch. 13, 180 A. 584; Id., 21 Del.Ch. 391, 190 A. 115; Id., 22 Del.Ch. 175, 194 A. 45; Frank v. Wilson & Co., Del.Ch., 9 A.2d 82; Id., Del.Ch., 32 A.2d 277; Bay Newfoundland Co. v.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
- Drug, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of Delaware · 1933
- Morris v. American Public Utilities CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.