Legal Opinion
Tri Union Frozen Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 13, 2017No. Consol. 14-00249PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Kelly, Judge:
Before the court for review is the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or “the Department”) remand determination filed pursuant to the court’s order in Tri Union Frozen Products, Inc. v. United States, 40 CIT -, 168 F.Supp.3d 1265 (2016) (“Tri Union I”). See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Sept. 1, 2016, ECF No. 118-1 (“Remand Results”).
In Tri Union I, the court granted Defendant’s request to remand “for Commerce to reconsider [Ad Hoc' Shrimp Trade Action Committee]’s arguments concerning Commerce’s reliance on Bangladeshi labor…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- List Indus., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Tri Union Frozen Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017