Weinmann v. Factor
California Court of Appeal
MOTION to dismiss appeal from judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Franklin A. Griffin, Judge. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that appellant’s opening brief had not been filed within the time prescribed. The notice of motion to dismiss was made and filed on the fourteenth day of July, 1923, and on the eleventh day of August, 1923, two days before the date set for hearing thereof, appellant filed his opening brief. The motion is covered by Coats v. Coats, 146 Cal. 443 [80 Pac. 694], and Berendsen v. Babdaty, 62 Cal. App. 185 [216 Pac. 385]. In the former case the brief was on file at the time the motion was granted, but it had been filed a few days after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamaker v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Coats v. CoatsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Berendsen v. BabdatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Yolo Water & Power Co. v. EdmandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cornell University Medical College v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Waugaman v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Clinton v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Johnston v. ReinhardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930