Scott v. Scott
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill sought to cancel a conveyance of land.
The decree was: “This cause coming on to be heard on demurrers of Respondents, H. L. McGill and Ethel Scott, and after argument by counsel and considerations by the Court, and the Court is of the opinion that the named respondent’s demurrers to their aspect of the bill as amended seeking the cancelation of the mortgage transferred to Respondent McGill by Dr. W. A. Beason, under Title 20, Paragraph 15, page 77 of the Code of Alabama, be and the same are hereby sustained; that as the demurrer to the other aspects of the bill, said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Bush v. GreerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heartsill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Scott v. McGillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Cornelius v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Cunningham v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1952