Legal Opinion
Loubet v. Loubet
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The opposing affidavit of the defendant contained no recital of facts which would be admissible in evidence, nor was any documentary proof submitted to show that there was a genuine issue as to any material fact alleged in the complaint. Practice Book §§ 300, 303; Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co., 154 Conn. 607, 613, 228 A.2d 149; Rathkopf v. Pearson, 148 Conn. 260, 263, 170 A.2d 135.
There is no error.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Kasowitz v. Mutual Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Dorazio v. M. B. Foster Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Citizens National Bank v. HubneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Manchester Memorial Hospital v. WhitneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Ellum v. Prudential InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970