Shaw v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND
MORENO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motion to remand to state court and Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. Having considered the parties’ moving papers, materials submitted in support therewith, and oral argument, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion. The Court’s order renders Defendant’s motion moot.
I. Facts
Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of investors who used Defendant Charles Schwab’s web site to conduct purchases and sales of stocks, options, and other securities. In particular, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Green v. Ameritrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003
- Kenneth Rothschild Trust v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Riley v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Dabit v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.