Legal Opinion

State v. Manley

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1984No. C9-83-1517PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying defendant-appellant’s post-trial motion for a judgment of acquittal or a new trial. A jury found appellant guilty of speeding in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.14, subd. 5 (1982).

The original complaint, however, charged appellant with violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.14, subd. 2 (1982). On the second day of trial, after the state had rested its case, appellant moved for dismissal. The state was permitted to amend the complaint and charge appellant with a subdivision 5 violation. Appellant maintains the amendment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerdes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. DoedenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuerraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. CaswellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. OstremCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API