Legal Opinion

State v. Doeden

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1976No. 46629PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a pretrial appeal by the state, pursuant to Rule 29.03, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from an order of the district court denying the state’s motion to amend a criminal complaint. We reverse and remand.

Defendant was arrested and charged with possession of a firearm without a permit, Minn. St. 624.714, subd. 1, and being in actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence, Minn. St. 169.121, subd. 1(a). The first of these offenses is a gross misdemeanor; the latter is a misdemeanor. At the start of the omnibus hearing, the state moved to amend the complaint to include a…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GisegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. WickstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API