State v. Ostrem
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
This is an appeal from a jury conviction for aiding and abetting burglary in the second degree and aiding and abetting theft in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.582, subd. 2(a) (burglary), and 609.52, subd. 2(1) (1992) (theft). Appellant argues that: 1) the trial court’s instructions on aiding and abetting after dismissing the original charges of second degree theft and burglary were error; 2) the photo line-up was so impermissibly suggestive as to violate due process; and 8) there was insufficient evidence to prove guilt. We reverse.
FACTS
In the morning of November 2, 1992,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. OstremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995