Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davenport v. Gruber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. 88-3702; CA A61071Published

1Concurrence

RIGGS, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur with the majority’s result, but I would reach that conclusion by a different path. We are not compelled to decide this case on the parties’ constitutional arguments, if there is a non-constitutional dispositive result.1

*286The 1959 tax deed conveyed “timber” to the county, but specified no time period for removal of the timber. If a conveyance of timber does not specify the time within which the timber must be removed, a court will imply a reasonable time. Franke v. Welch, 254 Or 149, 151, 458 P2d 441 (1969). However, because it “has the effect of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Franke v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Parsons v. BoggieOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Emerson v. HOOD RIVER COUNTYOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Clyde Et Ux v. Walker Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API