Legal Opinion
In re Crane
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 9, 1989No. 88-166PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The petitioners, Ann Crane and Anne Eaton, former and incumbent Directors of Workers’ Compensation, respectively, appeal to this court from a decision of the New Hampshire Personnel Appeals Board (the Board) denying their request for an *295upward adjustment in the salary grade of the position of Director of Workers’ Compensation (the Director). We affirm the decision of the Board and dismiss the petition.
On June 9, 1986, the labor commissioner requested that the division of personnel review and upgrade the Director position from salary grade 26 to salary grade 28. On June 4, 1987, the Director…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- In re BagleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Jeannont v. New Hampshire Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Wilson v. State Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Winn v. JordanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DHB, Inc. v. Town of PembrokeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Petition of HoytSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- In re EllisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Appeal of McKerley Health FacilitiesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- Appeal of DumontSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991