Legal Opinion
Murata Mfg. Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 20, 1993No. Court No. 92-03-00208PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 56.1 plaintiffs move for judgment upon the agency record. Plaintiffs challenge Cellular Mobile Telephones and Subassemblies from Japan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 Fed. Reg. 7,728 (1992), issued by the Interna*260tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce). This action is brought pursuant to section 516A(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) (1988), and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988).
Background
The administrative review which is the subject of this action was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Floral Trade Council of Davis, Cal. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Cemex, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- FAG U.K. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- NSK Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.