Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ferrante

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 20, 2006No. S06A0902, S06A1219, S06A1221-S06A1223 and S06A1225PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Presiding Justice.

These appeals arise out of multiple asbestos actions currently pending in the Superior and State Courts of Cobb County. In each action, plaintiffs, appellees here, sought a judicial determination that it is unconstitutional to apply the newly enacted asbestos claims statute, OCGA § 51-14-1 et seq. (the Act), to their pending asbestos cases. After consolidated hearings were held, the trial courts issued virtually identical orders ruling that because the Act required asbestos plaintiffs to provide proof that exposure to asbestos was a substantial contributing factor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. City Council of Augusta v. MangellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Enger v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. John Crane, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nathans v. DiamondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. In Re Quigley Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. The Lamar Co., LLC v. City of Marietta, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2008
  5. Kautter v. KautterSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API