Legal Opinion

Nathans v. Diamond

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 21, 2007No. S07A0738PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEARS, Chief Justice.

The appellants, Increase and Joy Nathans, appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellees, Dr. Andrew Diamond, and Northside Ear, Nose and Throat, P.C. (“Northside ENT”). On appeal, the appellants contend that the trial court erred in ruling that their expert was not qualified to give an opinion in this case under the standards set forth in OCGA § 24-9-67.1 (c) and erred in ruling against their claims that OCGA § 24-9-67.1 is unconstitutional. For the reasons that follow, we find no merit to these contentions and affirm.

On March 19, 2003, Dr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Cotten v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Kneip v. Southern Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Enger v. ErwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  5. MCG Health, Inc. v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Hankla v. PostellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Murphy v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Dubois v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Zarate-Martinez v. EchemendiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API