Legal Opinion

Lowry v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 19, 2001No. CV 00-1277-BRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BROWN, District Judge.

This action comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Mandamus Relief (# 6). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS that Motion.

THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff is an attorney who represents Social Security claimants seeking disability benefits. Plaintiff asserts that Defendant, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, has had authority since 1991 to “adjust the fees that claimants representatives may charge clients in disability cases to reflect changes in the cost of living (COLA) just as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Donald L. Meek v. County of Riverside, and Albert J. Wojcik, Judge, Riverside Municipal Court Rodney Walker, Judge, Riverside Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. City of Redwood City, California and Albert v. Pinotti, Individually and Dba the People's Police PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Carlos Soler v. Roger F. Scott, Warden, Fci-Safford, Az United States Bureau of Prisons U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. City of Hayward, United States of America v. City of HaywardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salazar v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  2. Vaz v. McHenryDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API