Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Hayward, United States of America v. City of Hayward
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 1994No. 93-15190, 93-15195PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
In response to the 1988 Fair housing Act (“FHA”) Amendments prohibiting discrimination based on familial status, a mobilehome park owner terminated the park’s adults-only status. A city-appointed arbitrator concluded that this change in policy decreased the housing services provided by the park to its tenants and accordingly required the owner to reduce the rent pursuant to a city rent control ordinance. The United States sued the City of Hayward in federal court for violating § 3617 of the FHA. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States because it…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Palmore v. SidotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Brenda Brown v. City of Tucson, a Municipal Corporation of the State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Nelson Walker, and Fair Housing Foundation of Long Beach, Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. City of Lakewood, a California MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.