Legal Opinion

Hanner v. Tidwell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 2, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Tidford

— Reversing.

Appellee sued appellant on a note allegedly executed by appellant’s decedent and reading as follows:

“One Day after date I promise to pay to Geo. W. Tidwell $500.00 five hundred dollars at 6% interest until paid. For value received of him for cash loaned to me this Jan. 27 — 1937.
“W. 0. O’Bryan.”

The note was written by appellee with a fountain pen on the back of an envelope and allegedly signed by O’Bryan with a lead pencil. By his answer, appellant traversed the material allegations of the petition, and specifically denied that his decedent had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Cooperative Realty Co. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. Wickliffe v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Reesman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. Carolene Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Stephens v. Bonding Ass'n of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API