State v. Burns
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.
¶ 57. (dissenting).
The issue presented is whether Burns is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice when (1) the circuit court barred Burns from presenting evidence *762that the accuser's post-assault behavior and loss of virginity were caused by her having been sexually assaulted by her grandfather rather than by Burns; and (2) the State's closing argument misleadingly stated that no explanation existed for the accuser's post-assault behavior other than Burns' guilt. I conclude that Burns should be given a new trial under these circumstances.
¶ 58. Applying the totality of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. BVOCIKCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010