Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Burns

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2011No. 2009AP118-CRPublished

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 57. (dissenting).

The issue presented is whether Burns is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice when (1) the circuit court barred Burns from presenting evidence *762that the accuser's post-assault behavior and loss of virginity were caused by her having been sexually assaulted by her grandfather rather than by Burns; and (2) the State's closing argument misleadingly stated that no explanation existed for the accuser's post-assault behavior other than Burns' guilt. I conclude that Burns should be given a new trial under these circumstances.

¶ 58. Applying the totality of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HicksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. State v. BVOCIKCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API