Legal Opinion

State v. BVOCIK

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 3, 2010No. 2009AP140-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.

¶ 1. In State v. Weiss, 2008 WI App 72, ¶¶ 15-17, 312 Wis. 2d 382, 752 N.W.2d 372, we held that when a prosecutor's closing argument asks the jury to draw an inference that the prosecutor knows or should know is not true, it is improper argument which may require reversal. This is a Weiss-type case. The State alleged that Clifford D. Bvocik used a computer to facilitate a meeting with what he thought to be an underage girl in order to have sex, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.075(1) (2007-08). There never was an underage girl; she was a twenty-eight-year-old woman pretending to be fourteen.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  2. State v. MayoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McSwineNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. BurnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BurnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API