Legal Opinion

Marciano v. MONY Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2007No. Civil Action 05-4748PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION.521

II.BACKGROUND.521

A. Procedural and Factual History.521

B. The Arbitration Agreement and the NASD Provisions .522

1. Form U-4.523

2. NASD provisions.523

III. DISCUSSION.524

A. Law.524

1. Federal law applies.524

2. The legal standard under the Federal Arbitration Act.525

B. Analysis .527

1. Each party’s definition under the NASD Code.527

a. The Marcianos are “associated persons” under the NASD Code.527

b. MONY Life is not an “associated person” under the NASD Code.527

c. MONY Life is a “certain other” under the NASD Code.528(i)…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maloney-Refaie v. Bridge at School, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  2. Valentine Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. AgahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Stanley-Laman Group, Ltd. v. HyldahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Dougherty v. VFG, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API