Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 77PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the trial judge’s ruling permitting the State to join the offenses for trial.

Defendant first argues that there was procedural error in that the motion for joinder did not set forth the grounds except by reference to a statute. The provisions of G.S. 15A-951 require that all motions made prior to trial must be in writing and must state the grounds upon which the motion is based. Here the State submitted a written motion to join the cases prior to trial stating that it was made pursuant to G.S. 15A-926. Defendant answered the State’s motion with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. WhitlowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API