Legal Opinion

Davis v. Highway Motor Underwriters

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. 27551PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

This is an action to reform a public liability automobile insurance policy and to recover upon the policy as reformed. The case was assigned to an equity court and tried to a judge without the intervention of a jury. From a decree reforming the policy and entering judgment against the defendant this appeal was taken.

The defendant, Highway Motor Underwriters of Kansas City, Missouri, is a reciprocal insurance exchange, authorized under chapter 44, art. 15 (sections 44-1501 to 44-1513) Comp. St. 1929, to write such an insurance contract as is involved here. A. R. Talbot Underwriters, Inc., of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  4. Robinson v. Union Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. McMahon v. PearlmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flamme v. Wolf Insurance AgencyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Heikes v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Krug Park Amusement Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Mogil v. Maryland Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Jensen v. RomighNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API