Legal Opinion

Jayne v. Sebewaing Coal Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Huron; Beach, J. Case by William T. Jayne against the Sebewaing Coal Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The defendant was engaged in coal mining. The mine was about 125 feet deep. Its employes were let down into the mine, and taken out, through a perpen*243clicular shaft, by means of a cage. The coal was raised in the same manner. The shaft had two cages. When one went down the other came up. The bottom of the cage contained a track upon which cars loaded with coal were run from the level for hoisting. The'se cages were raised a,nd lowered by means of a drum and engine upon the- surface. Each cage was about 4 feet 1 inch wide, 5 feet 7 inches long, and 4 feet 7 inches high, to the crossbeam, which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. DochertyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. King v. DawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Thompson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kreye v. Longville Long Leaf Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API