Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Life Insurance v. Christian

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1932No. 21252PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

Plaintiff instituted suit seeking to recover on a health and accident policy issued by defendant. The cause was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff, from which judgment of the court defendant appeals.

The parties will be referred to as they appear in the trijjl court. The record discloses that plaintiff made application to defendant for a health and accident policy and that as a result of said application defendant issued to plaintiff its health and accident policy, providing for an annual premium of $94 per year.

Said amount accompanied the application. The policy was dated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. B. & O. Employees' Rel. Ass'n v. PostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Rayburn v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. American Home Circle v. EggersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Christian v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Brix v. Peoples Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cobb v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co of Hartford, Conn. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API