Legal Opinion
Kennco Contractors, Inc. v. Duncan
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 2001No. 23630PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAHMEYER, Judge.
Appellants, Stanley W. Duncan and Rebecca A. Duncan, appeal from the trial court’s judgment that they owe Respondent, Kennco Contractors, Inc. (“Kennco”) $4,276.98 based upon a theory of quantum meruit Because the Duncans failed to file a transcript of the trial in this matter, we must dismiss the appeal.
Kennco sued the Duncans in a two-count petition alleging that the Duncans entered into a contract with Kennco for remodeling work on the Duncans’ property. In Count 1, Kennco alleged that the Duncans breached their contract with Kennco by refusing to pay the balance due under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Webcon Group, Inc. v. S.M. Properties, L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bastain v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rhodes v. ZhangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Martin v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support EnforcementMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leonard v. FrisbieMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- O'Brien & Gere Technical Services, Inc. v. Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint VentureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- O'Brien & Gere Technical Services, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint Venture Fru-Con Construction Corporation, a Missouri Corporation Fluor Daniel, Inc., a California Corporation, Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint Venture Fru-Con Construction Corporation Fluor Daniel, Inc., Third Party v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004