O'Brien & Gere Technical Services, Inc. v. Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint Venture
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
This case illustrates the adage which counsels against going into business with someone who has less money than you.
The Procter & Gamble Company hired the Fru-Con/Fluor Daniel Joint Venture (the Joint Venture) 1 as a general contractor to build a paper-manufacturing complex in Cape Girardeau, Missouri. In April 1998, the Joint Venture hired O’Brien & Gere (OBG) to design and build six buildings in the complex for the lump sum of $15.3 million. In April 1999, after the project had undergone many changes and delays and the Joint Venture had paid OBG $21.8 2 million, the Joint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Schwartz v. Shelby Construction CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- McBee v. Gustaaf Vandecnocke Revocable TrustSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Kinetic Energy Development Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Mid-West Electronics, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- O'Brien & Gere Technical Services, Inc., a New York Corporation v. Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint Venture Fru-Con Construction Corporation, a Missouri Corporation Fluor Daniel, Inc., a California Corporation, Fru-Con/fluor Daniel Joint Venture Fru-Con Construction Corporation Fluor Daniel, Inc., Third Party v. Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Structural Polymer Group v. Zoltek CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Turner Construction Co. v. MJ Flaherty Co.Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County · 2017