Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sch. Dist. of Phila. v. Friedman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1986No. Appeal, 2073 C.D. 1984Published

1Dissent

*277Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Rogers:

I respectfully dissent because I believe that the record supports Judge Caesars findings and that his findings support his conclusions reached after a comprehensive consideration of the facts and the law, that Mr. Friedman suffered from a non-job-related handicap or disability and that the school district in discharging him on account of his handicap or disability violated Section 5(a) of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act, 43 P.S. 955(a).

Mr. Friedman started as a volunteer in the school districts data processing department in 1969. In January 1970, he was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. HogeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Brentwater Homes, Inc. v. WeibleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Royster v. McGowen Ford, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API