Legal Opinion

Coady v. Chao

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2016-2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRIAN COADY, Plaintiff, v. No. 16-cv-2010 (DLF) ELAINE CHAO, Secretary of Transportation, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Brian Coady brings this action against his former employer, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Coady alleges that DOT discriminated against him based on his sex and disability, retaliated against him, and subjected him to a hostile work environment. Compl. ¶¶ 49–84, Dkt. 1. Before the Court is DOT’s…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API