Legal Opinion
Groome v. Feyh
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided December 30, 1986No. 86-8195-CivPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE has come before the court upon the motion to dismiss, for lack of in personam jurisdiction, filed by the defendants, Ronald E. Feyh, Rick L. Fugitt, and N. Robert Cann (defendants).
FACTS
The plaintiff, Sam W. Groome (plaintiff) has sued the defendants for breach of contract and for fraud. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants contacted the plaintiff in Florida by telephone to solicit the plaintiff’s investment in a Missouri corporation named Corporate Coachworks, Corporation (corporation). The plaintiff further alleges that “following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Prentice v. PRENTICE COLOUR, INC.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
- Green v. USF & G CORP.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Pizzabiocche v. VinelliDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1991
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. Scott's Furniture Warehouse Showroom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Cauff Lippman & Co. v. Apogee Finance Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.