Legal Opinion
Pizzabiocche v. Vinelli
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided September 6, 1991No. 89-243-CIV-FTM-17BPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This motion is before the Court on the motion of Defendants, Irene Hamernik (Hamernik), Luis Felix Bustelo (Bustelo), and Urbano E. Garcia-Tobar (Garcia-To-bar), filed pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to quash service of process and also on the motion of Defendants, Hamernik and Bustelo to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, Jorge Pizzabiocche, Rodolfo Deambrosi, Jose Enrique Gonzalez, Guillermo Caballero, Osvaldo Fraga (Plaintiff shareholders) bring their action individually…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bloom v. AH Pond Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1981
- Williams Electric Co. v. Honeywell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alberto Kreimerman v. Casa Veerkamp, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Laino v. Cuprum S.A. de C.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Paola A. Alvardo-Fernandez v. Matthew MazoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Black v. BryantDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Hein v. Cuprum, S.A. De CV.District Court, N.D. New York · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.