Legal Opinion
Union Electric Steel Co. v. Imperial Bank
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 28, 1923No. 2929PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The object of this writ of error is to review the judgment entered in the District Court on a verdict directed by the trial judge.
The proceedings in this case were instituted by the Imperial Bank of Canada, against the Union Electric Steel Company, a corporation of Delaware, doing business in the Western district of Pennsylvania, to recover the amount of three “trade acceptances” or bills of exchange drawn by the Volta Manufacturing Company, Limited, of Canada, a foreign corporation, and accepted by the Steel Company. The issues raised on all three bills are alike, and so…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Meyer & Chapman State Bank v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Shull v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Fraser-Smith Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.