City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLocher, J.
The majority’s position today is in derogation of the Ohio Constitution and well-established legal doctrine by this court. For the reasons to follow, I am compelled to dissent.
Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution empowers municipalities “[t]o exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws.” When this home-rule provision was adopted by amendment to the Ohio Constitution, this court found that “the people of the municipality are given power…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.