Legal Opinion

City of Kettering v. State Employment Relations Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1986No. 85-1459Published

1DissentLocher, J.

The majority’s position today is in derogation of the Ohio Constitution and well-established legal doctrine by this court. For the reasons to follow, I am compelled to dissent.

Section 3, Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution empowers municipalities “[t]o exercise all powers of local self-government and to adopt and enforce within their limits such local police, sanitary and other similar regulations, as are not in conflict with general laws.” When this home-rule provision was adopted by amendment to the Ohio Constitution, this court found that “the people of the municipality are given power…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northern Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of ParmaOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. City of Canton v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bazell v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API