Legal Opinion

Kopylec v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 28, 2010No. AC 30901Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This appeal is one of a number in a long-standing zoning dispute. The plaintiff, Joseph Kopylec, appeals from the trial court’s judgment upholding, in part, a cease and desist order issued by the North Branford zoning enforcement officer. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court misconstrued the North Branford zoning regulations with regard to his use of woodchips. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff is the co-owner of 3.4 acres located at 944 Totoket Road in North Branford (town), an R-40 residential zone, which permits residential dwellings, their…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Lallier v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF STAFFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Curran v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API