Legal Opinion

Benjamin v. Ricks

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1976No. Civ. 17030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Upon trial of a special defense (see Code Civ, Proc., § 597) the trial court held that exclusive jurisdiction of plaintiff’s claim was vested in the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board. (See Lab. Code, §§ 3600, 3601.) Plaintiff appeals, contending that the exclusive remedy provision of Labor Code section 3601 is outside the scope of the constitutional authorization for a workers’ compensation program and denies plaintiff due process of law and equal protection of laws under the federal and California Constitutions. We have concluded that these contentions are not meritorious…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Purdy & Fitzpatrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Graphic Arts International UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Wright v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Sienkiewycz v. DressellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API