Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 22, 1993No. A061777PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, Acting P. J.
In this workers’ compensation proceeding, we granted the applicant’s petition for a writ of review to decide the question whether California Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (d), as applied to petitioner, violates her constitutional rights to equal protection of the law and due process. (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7, subd. (a).)
Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (d), provides in effect that no compensation shall be paid for an employee’s psychiatric injury resulting from a “ ‘regular and routine employment event’ ” unless the employee…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- McDonald v. Board of Election Comm'rs of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ritchie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Frantz v. Campbell County Memorial HospitalWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.