Legal Opinion
Benson v. Taralseth
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 20, 1986No. Civ. 10968PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
Richard M. Benson, plaintiff, appeals from the district court judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Benson’s motion for a new trial challenged the court’s conclusion that the defendants had acquired title, pursuant to Section 47-06-03, N.D.C.C., to several lots in the Lake Metigoshe area of Bottineau County. We affirm.
In September 1951 Ruby Benson acquired a parcel of undeveloped and unplat-ted land in the area of Lake Metigoshe in Bottineau County. The parcel of land was described as follows:
“COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of Lot 15 in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodland v. WoodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Burlington Northern, Inc. v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Cranston v. WintersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Herb Hill Insurance, Inc. v. RadtkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Gimbel v. MagrumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Moody v. SundleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Williston Cooperative Credit Union v. FossumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State Bank & Trust of Kenmare v. BrekkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.