United States v. Rosemond
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Justus Rosemond appeals his conviction for using a firearm during a federal drug-trafficking offense. The United States charged Rosemond with that offense under alternate theories, alleging that he was the principal (i.e., the person who fired a gun during a drug transaction) and, alternatively, that he aided and abetted a cohort who fired the weapon. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude that the trial court properly instructed the jury on these alternate theories and that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. BivinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Diaz-Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.