Legal Opinion

United States v. Rosemond

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2012No. 11-4046PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Justus Rosemond appeals his conviction for using a firearm during a federal drug-trafficking offense. The United States charged Rosemond with that offense under alternate theories, alleging that he was the principal (i.e., the person who fired a gun during a drug transaction) and, alternatively, that he aided and abetted a cohort who fired the weapon. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we conclude that the trial court properly instructed the jury on these alternate theories and that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s guilty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Hedgpeth v. PulidoSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Dean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. Pamela Jones, Katresa Marie Johnson, Mark J. Scott, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. BivinsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Diaz-Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API