Legal Opinion

United States v. Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 29, 2013No. 11-1408, 11-1406, 11-1404PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

Defendants Mark Rosalez, Juan Ruelas, and Justin Hernandez, all of whom were federal inmates at the time of the underlying crimes, were jointly tried and convicted by a jury of conspiracy to assault anoth er inmate, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and murder in the second degree, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111(a) and 2(a). All three of the defendants were sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment as a result of these convictions. Each defendant now appeals his convictions. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the judgment in each appeal.

I

Fac…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. RufaiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. DeiterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Anthony GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API