Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Santaliz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 24, 1992PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
The defendant was convicted after a jury trial in the Superior Court on indictments charging him with unlawful possession of heroin with intent to distribute, G. L. c. 94C, § 32 (1990 ed.), and the unlawful possession of heroin with the intent to distribute while within 1,000 feet of the property of a school, G. L. c. 94C, § 32J, as inserted by St. 1989, c. 227, § 2). Different judges of the Superior Court denied the defendant’s motions to suppress the heroin and to dismiss the school zone charge on constitutional grounds. We allowed an application for direct appellate review. We affirm the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BorgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. StoreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SannaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. DePeizaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. AlvaradoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. MottaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.