Legal Opinion
In Re Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 10, 2009No. 09-80163PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
I. Overview
A request for review of a district judge’s determination of appropriate fees sought for indigent legal representation in a felony case by counsel appointed under the Criminal Justice Act (“CJA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, has been lodged with this court. As a delegate of our circuit’s Chief Judge discharging the statutory responsibility to review claims for compensation in excess of statutorily mandated maximum amounts, see id. § 3006A(d)(3), I must decide whether to approve the district judge’s reduction in the fees sought. Having considered the hearing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Rosenfeld v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Rosenfeld v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- United States v. MosleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.