Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports

Decided March 19, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

BILL LOCKYER Attorney General ANTHONY S. Da VIGO Deputy Attorney General

THE HONORABLE SHARON D. STUART, CITY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, CITY OF LOMPOC, has requested an opinion on the following question:

May a city prohibit, limit or regulate the operation of a boarding house or rooming house business in a single family home located in a low density residential (R-1) zone, where boarding house or rooming house is defined as a residence or dwelling, other than a hotel, wherein three or more rooms, with or without individual or group cooking facilities, are rented to individuals under separate rental…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API