Johnson v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

*264 {¶ 1} In this real-property-valuation case, appellant, property owner William S. Johnson, who is pursuing this appeal pro se, challenges appellee Clark County auditor's determination of the current agricultural use valuation ("CAUV") for the subject property for tax year 2013. Appellee Clark County Board of Revision ("BOR") rejected Johnson's claims, and the Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") affirmed the BOR's decision.

{¶ 2} Johnson has appealed and argues that the BTA misapplied the burden of proof, improperly applied a presumption of validity to the BOR's decision, and failed to properly…