Legal Opinion

People v. Hite

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1901No. Crim. No. 838PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of an assault with intent to commit robbery and from an order denying him a new trial.

1. The principal point urged on this appeal is, that the verdict is not supported by the evidence; that there is no evidence to show that defendant intended to rob the prosecuting witness, Howard.

There is evidence in the case to warrant the following statement of facts: The defendant met Howard for the first time, at one o’clock on the morning of the tenth day of June, 1901, in Hudson’s saloon, in the town of Red Bluff. During the next two hours…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. WoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API