NYT CABLE TV v. Homestead at Mansfield, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1ConcurrenceHandles, J.
In this case we are asked to examine whether the statutory scheme found in the Cable Television Act (the “Act”), N.J.S.A. 48:5A-1 to -53, and more specifically its access rights section, N.J.S.A. 48:5A-49 (“Section 49”), is constitutional. There can be no quarrel with the proposition that, under the Act, entry on any property and the installation of cable television constitutes the taking of property for which just compensation must be paid as a matter of constitutional due process. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 102 S.Ct. 3164, 73 L.Ed.2d 868 (1982). Within this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.