Sublett v. Edgewood Universal Cabling Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BECKWITH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Edgewood Universal Cabling Systems, Inc. and Curtis Reasor (Doc. No. 13) and Plaintiff Troy Sublett’s Motion for Leave to Respond to Defendant’s Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is well-taken and is GRANTED; Plaintiffs motion for leave to respond is MOOT.
I. Background
The Plaintiff in this case is Troy Sublett. Plaintiff is an African-American male and adherent of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blagg v. S.T.O.F.F.E. Fed. Credit UnionOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Hill v. City of Dayton Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- Republic Technologies International, LLC v. Maley (In re Republic Technologies International, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002